تحلیل نظری چالش‌های فراروی تشکیل پرونده شخصیت در فرایند حقوقی ایران

One of the progressive objectives of criminal jurisprudence lies in calibrating punitive measures to the authentic personality traits of offenders, operationalized through the compilation of personality dossiers. Consequently, these dossiers constitute an indispensable element of judicial proceedings that must be systematically integrated with criminal case files, a concept originally articulated within the positivist school of criminological thought. However, the practical implementation of personality dossiers within Iran's criminal adjudication framework encounters substantial impediments, including investigative magistrates and prosecutors procedural negligence, legislative inattention within the judicial architecture, and the fiscal burdens associated with dossier compilation - challenges demanding systematic analysis to formulate viable counterstrategies. This research accordingly engages in a theoretical examination of obstacles hindering personality dossier implementation within Iran's legal due process. Empirical findings reveal multidimensional barriers to this legal institution's effective application, broadly categorized as legislative, judicial, and executive constraints. Foremost among legislative challenges are parliament's inattention to this progressive jurisprudential concept, statutory limitations restricting mandatory compilation to specific offenses, predetermined sentencing structures, and inadequate diversity in enforcement mechanisms. Judicial sector obstacles principally involve deficiencies in judicial training curricula, caseload congestion precipitating dossier compilation oversight, absence of specialized training programs regarding personality assessments, and non-specialized judicial appointments. Critical executive branch challenges encompass fiscal constraints, infrastructural deficiencies, the cost-intensive nature of comprehensive dossier preparation, and insufficient availability of modern technological laboratory facilities for defendant evaluation - complexities necessitating tripartite collaboration among legislative, executive, and judicial branches for systemic resolution. Methodologically, this investigation employs descriptive-analytical research methodology utilizing library-based data collection instruments to systematically examine theoretical and practical barriers to personality dossier implementation within Iranian criminal proceedings, while proposing comprehensive solutions through legislative reform, judicial training enhancement, and strategic resource allocation.