Criticism of non-Islamic security rule

It will not be possible to establish stable security without the application of security governance. Security governance is the regulation of processes, mechanisms and tools to achieve security. In order to achieve their (internal) security, the countries of the world have accepted a kind of security rule and put its implementation in their agenda. The Islamic Republic of Iran, based on its principles and foundations, is implementing a type of security rule that includes fundamental differences from the common security rules in the world today. Undoubtedly, the acceptance and implementation of non-native security regimes cannot bring the expected results and fruits. The problem of this article is not explaining the reasons and why non-Islamic security governance models are not acceptable in the country. The purpose of this article is to explain the criticisms of non-Islamic (affirmative) security governance. The author's findings indicate that there are serious criticisms of non-Islamic (positivist) security governance in the fields of ontology, epistemology, methodology, and anthropology, which are in contradiction with the philosophical foundations of the Islamic Republic.