Comparative comparison of basic concepts in the school of resistance and realist, structuralist and post-structuralist schools

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

2 Doctoral student of National Security, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Law, Theology and Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Golestan University, Golestan, Iran

Abstract

Resistance, in Shia political jurisprudence, modeled after the uprising of Imam Hossein (AS), is considered an active strategy in facing obstacles and threats, and its application in the Islamic Revolution of Iran had at least two major and fundamental results: one in the victory of the revolution and Its successes in various fields and the development of discursive and strategic power in the region and the world, by creating a transnational alliance, called "Resistance Axis", with the aim of confronting the oppression and exploitation of hegemonic powers.With these events, the important security schools of the world, like the realist tradition, were challenged. From this point of view, explaining the dimensions and angles of resistance as a theoretical framework, especially in comparison with other prominent security schools, is an inevitable necessity, as it has caused a change in the balance of power as in hard and semi-hard campaigns;In the field of science and theoretical foundations of security and soft power, it can replace other strategies and theories and gain the persuasion and consensus of elites and politicians on its superiority. In this research, library method was used to collect data and descriptive-explanatory method was used for analysis.

Keywords